I think that the Heat are better off without Dwayne Wade, because if they let Lebron shoot all the important shots and take control, they would be better off. I think this because if the Heat were to trade Dwayne Wade for a great center or point guard it would help Lebron and give him a change to take charge because he certainly has the ability to do that.
When Lebron played for the Cavaliers Mo Williams and Antawn Jameson were the only other players to average over 15 points per game in the 2009-10 season. (each averaging 15.8 points) And the Cavaliers still had the best record in the league that year. Lebron on the other hand lead the team in points, rebounds, assists, and steals. This shows how Lebron can successfully take over a team and have the best record in the league.
The team that the Heat have with Dwayne Wade, Chis Bosh and young point guard Mario Chalmers, Lebron has a better supporting cast then he had with the Cavaliers. But right now Dwayne wade is what is slowing up the team to a championship. Lebron just doesn't feel comfortable with another star on the floor at the same time and sharing the wealth with him. If the heat were to get a pass first type of point guard it would help them a whole lot, because Lebron would feel more comfortable and i think that is what what the Heat need. Lebron to feel comfortable scoring the ball whenever, because he certainly has the talent to score better than anyone in the league. But if the Heat were to get a big man or two, it would help them a lot in the rebounding category because the Center position is what the Heat are missing. Because Joel Anthony and Udonis Haslem aren't great Centers. A third option would be to build a better bench because the Lebron James, Dwayne Wade and Chris Bosh are the only players on the team to average more than ten points per game, and you need more players that average about 12 points per game rather than Dwayne Wade.
FIrst of all, you're crazy to suggest that the Heat would be better off without Wade. Winning in the league takes three superstar players--it's a proven paradigm. No team wins an NBA championship based on the play of a point guard.
ReplyDeleteYou can only field five guys at a time! The teams that win have at least three very talented players on the floor the majority of the time. You bring up LeBron with the Cavs--what did they win, exactly? Oh, I remember--NOTHING. One thing you're right about is the fact that the Heat could use a center. Now that's a position that is proven to impact championships.
A few writing tips:
1. Proof your work. It's unacceptable for you to know your writing teacher is going to read this and you've got "i" uncapitalized. Make it look like you put some effort into this. This isn't some text you're sending your buddy. It's for school, so you need to formalize it a bit.
2. Lose "I think" from your writing. You want to sound bold and decisive, and "thinking" means you don't "know" what you're writing about.
3. You have the potential to form good complex sentences, but you don't need special punctuation to do so. Take this one: "When Lebron played for the Cavaliers Mo Williams and Antawn Jameson were the only other players to average over 15 points per game in the 2009-10 season. (each averaging 15.8 points) And the Cavaliers still had the best record in the league that year." It should read: "In the 2009-2010 Cavaliers season, Mo Williams and Antawn Jameson were the only other players to average over 15 points per game, and the Cavaliers still had the best record in the league that year." Put years up front in your sentences and use a comma to set off the phrase.
4. Look at this sentence: "Lebron to feel comfortable scoring the ball whenever, because he certainly has the talent to score better than anyone in the league." If you look at this sentence independently of the previous one, does it make sense? Remember that a sentence needs a subject and a predicate, and it needs to make sense. This sentence cannot stand independently, so it needs to be rewritten. It may look to you like it makes perfect sense when you write it, but if you proof your work, this sentence should call some attention to itself.